Handheld echocardiography versus auscultation for detection of rheumatic heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a major public health concern in developing countries, and routine screening has the potential to improve outcomes. Standard portable echocardiography (STAND) is far more sensitive than auscultation for the detection of RHD but remains cost-prohibitive in resource-limited settings. Handheld echocardiography (HAND) is a lower-cost alternative. The purpose of this study was to assess the incremental value of HAND over auscultation to identify RHD. METHODS: RHD screening was completed for schoolchildren in Gulu, Uganda, by using STAND performed by experienced echocardiographers. Any child with mitral or aortic regurgitation or stenosis plus a randomly selected group of children with normal STAND findings underwent HAND and auscultation. STAND and HAND studies were interpreted by 6 experienced cardiologists using the 2012 World Heart Federation criteria. Sensitivity and specificity of HAND and auscultation for the detection of RHD and pathologic mitral or aortic regurgitation were calculated by using STAND as the gold standard. RESULTS: Of 4773 children who underwent screening with STAND, a subgroup of 1317 children underwent HAND and auscultation. Auscultation had uniformly poor sensitivity for the detection of RHD or valve disease. Sensitivity was significantly improved by using HAND compared with auscultation for the detection of definite RHD (97.8% vs 22.2%), borderline or definite RHD (78.4% vs 16.4%), and pathologic aortic insufficiency (81.8% vs 13.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Auscultation alone is a poor screening test for RHD. HAND significantly improves detection of RHD and may be a cost-effective screening strategy for RHD in resource-limited settings.

Fast and low-cost analysis of heart rate variability reveals vegetative alterations in noncomplicated diabetic patients.

The aim of the present preliminary study was to describe a simple protocol for the analysis of the heart rate variability (HRV) that can reveal the different autonomic control between noncomplicated diabetic patients and normal subjects within 15 min. The power spectrum of the HRV was evaluated on 5-min-long electrocardiographic recordings in both the supine and the seated positions in 30 noncomplicated non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDDM) patients and in 30 healthy volunteers. In healthy subjects the low-frequency (LF) value was higher in seated position than in supine position, while in diabetic patients the LF value in seated position did not differ from that in supine position and did not differ from that in healthy subjects in supine position. The present work demonstrates that the protocol described reveals a different autonomic regulation of the heart rate in healthy subjects and in NIDDM patients even if there is no clinically evident autonomic neuropathy.

[Is transmission of heart murmurs via e-mail cost saving?]. / Er overføring av hjertebilyder via e-post kostnadsbesparende?

BACKGROUND: The use of pre-recorded heart murmur in an electronic referral for a remote consultation can save children and their parents from having to travel to the nearest out-patient clinic. The heart sound can be recorded by the GP at the local health clinic and sent by e-mail to the specialist. 41 clinics in the North Norway healt region have invested in equipment that makes pre-recorded sound referrals possible. This study analyses whether this investment is a cost-saving technology or not. METHODS: A yearly average of 50 children with a heart murmur are referred to a specialist in Troms. The costs of using pre-recorded telemedicine were compared to the costs of patient travelling to the nearest secondary care centre. RESULTS: Pre-recorded heart sound referrals cost from 216 000 NOK more per year than the alternative of bringing patients to the out-patient clinic. The number of children with a heart murmur needed in order to break even must exceed 195 per year, i.e. 1.7 children per GP per year. INTERPRETATION: The number of children with a heart murmur in Troms is too low for this method to be a cost-saving approach.

A low-cost, high-fidelity FM wireless precordial radiostethoscope for continuous monitoring of heart and breath sounds.

We constructed and tested an inexpensive (less than $50) FM wireless, acoustically shielded, precordial radiostethoscope that enables the anesthetist to follow the heart tones and breath sounds of the patient regardless of the anesthetist's location in the operating room. We compared our acoustically shielded device with a similar, but acoustically unshielded, commercially available device. We found the sound quality of our radiostethoscope to be superior to that of the commercial device; the signal-to-noise ratio of our device was 7.6 for heart tones and 8.4 for breath sounds, whereas the commercial device had a signal-to-noise ratio of 2.7 and 3.9 for heart tones and breath sounds, respectively. Our device offers all of the advantages of a radiostethoscope and has the added advantages of low cost and high fidelity.